AN OFFICER OF THE COURT'S
ACCOUNT OF WAGMAN'S APPEAL
 
1.  As counsel on USA v Wagman, I filed a brief in November 2005 and received a beautiful
     certificate admitting me to practice in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

2.  Yet when I called the Court after it reopened on January 9, 2006, I was advised that my brief had
     not been accepted for filing due to the prior counsel’s motion to be relieved, despite the fact that
     this same counsel had signed off on the motion for my admission to practice in the 5th Circuit.

3.  Finally, in May, 2006, I was advised my brief had been accepted, but when I made a request to
    modify it, I was advised I would have to motion the Court, which I determined would take an
    additional six months for an answer, so I sent a letter advising them to file the brief in the "as is"
    condition.

4. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals maintains a website that publishes decisions presumably to keep
    from answering calls from the thousands of counsel regarding the status of a case.  Regularly my
    client or I checked the website and periodically, I telephoned the Court.

5. Some time in April, 2007 I was advised by one of the team leaders in the 5th Circuit Court Of
    Appeals, that there had been no decision on the case and the matter was still before the Court.

6. Fast forward to late May, 2007, when I received a call from my client stating that he had been
    on the PACER pay site for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals web site and saw that an order denying
    our requested relief had been entered on February 12, 2007, of which I never received notification.
    Further frustrating the situation was by the time we had this information, the statute of limitations
    had run for a motion for renewal and reconsideration.

The case of USA v. Wagman is one of many cases that have transformed me into an outraged Officer of the Court. I encourage you to read the comments from my client regarding his matter and you decide how broken the system has become!

Our Constitution is suppose to guarantee certain unalienable rights, but guess what?  From my side of the eyeballs after 20+ years of practice, the system is broken. 

Our Constitution guarantees a free press, but how many defendants have been caught up in the system of “injustice”, tried and convicted in the press before even getting to the courthouse steps?

Calling all Officers of the Court who are true professionals that will lobby our Federal and State legislators to bring back common-sense to the Judiciary System, who will work long hours for little or no pay and restore our profession to its former dignity and fix our system.

I encourage all readers to explore the website of the demon hunter and read about USA v Wagman.  Be concerned, for one day you too could get caught up in the same type nightmare.

Respectfully submitted,

Florence F. Hessen, Esq
Licensed to Practice in New York,
New Jersey, Florida,
the companion Federal Jurisidictions and
the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
NEXT PAGE
FORWARD
 
This website is devoted to publicizing the actual rather than the Official version of facts surrounding the Federal Government's actions against Brent A. Wagman, which resulted in hundreds of senior citizens loosing their life's savings because of the corruption involved.  The actual facts suggest that at least one Senator, a number of other politicians and federal agents conspired to deceive and corrupt proceedings in a federal court for the benefits of a giant oil company. They also bring into question the charactor of several federal judges.  
 
It appears the court was acting at the behest of Enron to steal a gas field, which today would be worth nearly $1 billion.  Several Judges chose to ignore the corruption when confronted with it by a retired Federal Judge and continued to cover-up the Government's wrongdoing at the expense of hundreds of innocent senior citizens' life's savings and retirements.  Enron is no more, but the elderly are and left to struggle.  Instead of living the retirement of their dreams, some are destitute and have to live solely on social security checks and/or welfare while those responsible for their losses and in a position to correct things ignore their plight. 
 
There were hundreds of millions of dollars worth of assets, including 160+ oil wells, several oil field service companies and their equipment, a public company, and three separate offers of $10 million made directly to the court's receiver and the SEC, yet not one of these elderly received a dime.  The only beneficiary of the assets was the SEC's hand-picked receiver, Joseph Wielibinski and his counsel, Dennis Roossein.  As if this wasn't bad enough, when the State of Texas later filed suit against Wagman to recover their costs of plugging oil wells abandoned by Wielibinski and Wagman filed a cross-complaint against Wielibinski as the liable party, Roossein contacted the Texas Attorney General and within days Texas dropped its suit.  Apparently, they were willing to take Wagman's money, but not another attorney's to the detriment of the Texas Taxpayers.
 
Florence F. Hessen, Esquire sent to letters to 160 members of Congress whose constituents were harmed by the Federal Government's actions along with her account of the proceedings in the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, yet less than 5 responded and nearly all with form letters.  (Ms. Hessen is the daughter of Jules Hessen, founding partner of the prestigious New York City law firm of Hahn & Hessen LLP).  Most of the actual facts presented herein have a footnote linking you to the supporting document--which demonstrates how the judges conspired to protect the rogue Federal Agents and their hand-picked receiver.  If you don't have time to view all the documents, you owe it to yourself to read retired Judge Gueck's  Open Letter to the Shareholders and Investors outlining his findings and then his  Testimony to see how the US Magistrate treated him like a red-headed step-child and stopped his testimony of the corruption in this case.  His other filings outline frauds and threats by the Government against witnesses and defendants.
 
Click here for a list of the Congressional Representatives this information was sent to via US Post, fax, and email, the number of individuals affected in each Representative's district along with an estimate of the losses to those individuals.  It does not include losses to the over 4,000 shareholders of the various oil companies associated with Wagman.
JUSTICE DENIED:
USA vs. WAGMAN
Page 1
UPDATES